Why Didn’t Janhvi Kapoor Wear Sridevi’s Necklace at the Homebound Premiere? Netizens Speculate It’s Because Aishwarya Already Owns It

At the recent Mumbai premiere of Homebound, Janhvi Kapoor made headlines—not just for her acting but for her fashion choice. The young actress wore a royal blue saree previously worn by her late mother, Sridevi, at Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma’s wedding reception in 2017. The move was a deeply personal tribute, a nod to her mother’s enduring style and legacy. However, the absence of a key accessory—the iconic Polki necklace originally paired with the saree—immediately drew attention and sparked online controversy.

Fans were quick to notice that the jewelry, considered a statement piece and a symbol of Sridevi’s iconic fashion, was missing. Social media erupted with speculation about why Janhvi did not wear it. Sources revealed that Sridevi had gifted the necklace to Aishwarya Rai Bachchan years ago, making it unavailable for Janhvi. This revelation has ignited debates among fans and fashion enthusiasts, with opinions sharply divided.

Some viewers questioned whether the gift to Aishwarya was appropriate, arguing that such a significant piece of Sridevi’s personal collection should have remained within her family. Critics suggested that giving the necklace to another celebrity could overshadow Janhvi’s tribute, making it less personal and raising questions about Bollywood’s complex web of relationships and rivalries.

On the other hand, supporters defended the gesture as a traditional act of goodwill. In Bollywood, gifting heirlooms is often seen as a symbol of respect and camaraderie between families and peers. Many fans also pointed out that the saree alone, even without the necklace, was a touching homage to Sridevi, and that Janhvi’s decision to skip the jewelry might have been a conscious choice to assert her own identity rather than merely replicate her mother’s style.

The incident has sparked a broader conversation about the pressures faced by star children. Wearing their parents’ iconic looks comes with expectations: to honor legacy while simultaneously carving out a personal identity. Janhvi’s choice—saree yes, necklace no—can be seen as a subtle statement of independence, emphasizing that her tribute is heartfelt but not a replica. Yet, critics insist that omitting the necklace diluted the emotional impact and raised questions about the nuances of celebrity etiquette in India’s film industry.

Fashion experts also weighed in, noting that accessories often carry symbolic weight in Bollywood. They argue that while the saree was the centerpiece, the absence of the necklace unintentionally shifted the focus to industry politics and celebrity relationships, rather than the tribute itself.

Ultimately, Janhvi Kapoor’s Homebound premiere appearance has become more than a fashion statement—it’s a reflection of the ongoing debate over legacy, personal choice, and the intricate dynamics within Bollywood. The missing necklace, intentionally or not, has provoked controversy, showing how even the smallest details in celebrity culture can ignite national conversations. For Janhvi, the tribute was personal, but for fans and critics, it has become a case study in celebrity symbolism, family heirlooms, and the expectations that come with being a star child in one of the world’s most scrutinized industries.

This incident proves that in Bollywood, style is never just about fashion—it’s about history, relationships, and controversy.