46 Years in Films: Sham Kaushal Remembers the Friends Who Lent Him ₹100 and ₹200 to Begin His Journey

Updated: Aug 21

Forty-six years after entering the film industry, Sham Kaushal remembers the beginning not through the stars he eventually worked with or the films whose action he designed.
He remembers ₹100 and ₹200 notes borrowed from friends.
On August 8, veteran action director Sham Kaushal marked the anniversary of the day that changed the direction of his life. In a video shared on social media, he said that on August 8, 1980, he became a member of the Movie Stunts Union and formally entered an industry he had never originally come to Mumbai to join.
At the time, even getting through that door required help.
The union membership cost ₹1,000. Sham didn't have it.
Friends contributed small loans — ₹100 or ₹200 at a time — until he had enough to pay the fee. Other people helped him survive in Mumbai by covering rent or feeding him when he could not afford meals.
More than four decades later, Sham's anniversary message wasn't framed primarily as a celebration of personal achievement.
It was a thank-you.
Sham Kaushal did not come to Mumbai to enter films
One detail makes his eventual career particularly striking: cinema wasn't the original plan.
In his anniversary message, Sham explained that he had left his village in Punjab and come to Mumbai looking for employment rather than chasing a Bollywood dream.
He did find a job, but said he could not continue because he struggled with an intense inferiority complex. Circumstances — and, in Sham's telling, destiny and the intervention of friends — eventually brought him towards stunt work.
His son Vicky Kaushal has previously provided more background to this period.
Speaking about his father's early life, Vicky said Sham had an MA in English literature but remained unemployed in Punjab. The family did not own agricultural land, and his grandfather ran a small grocery shop in their village.
Vicky recalled that his father eventually arrived in Mumbai in 1978 and was prepared to take virtually any work available, even saying he would have worked as a sweeper because nobody back home would know.
That history makes August 8, 1980 more significant than a convenient career-anniversary date.
It represented a route into an industry Sham had not imagined joining when he arrived in the city.
The ₹1,000 he couldn't afford
Joining the stunt fraternity presented an immediate problem.
Sham said the membership fee was ₹1,000 — money he simply did not have.
Rather than describing one wealthy benefactor arriving to rescue him, his anniversary account remembers something much more modest.
Friends lent him ₹100.
Others gave ₹200.
Together, those small amounts enabled him to pay the fee.
That is an important distinction from reducing the story to “Sham Kaushal borrowed ₹1,000.”
His own recollection emphasises multiple people contributing small sums when he needed them.
And the financial help didn't stop with the membership.
Some hotel owners fed him for free
Sham also thanked hotel owners who provided him food without charging during difficult periods.
Friends helped him pay the rent on his room.
He remembered those acts alongside the stuntmen, stunt directors and action directors who subsequently taught him the profession and gave him opportunities to work.
That collective support is arguably the central theme of his anniversary message.
Today, Sham's name is attached to some of Indian cinema's largest productions. Looking back, however, he chose to focus on people whose names audiences may never know.
Without their help, even getting through the industry's front door had been difficult.
The struggle didn't end once Sham became a stuntman
A union card gave Sham an opportunity.
It did not make stunt work safe or financially comfortable.
Vicky has previously described the physical risks his father took during his years as a stunt performer.
In a Film Companion interview reported by The Indian Express, Vicky recalled his father performing full-body fire stunts, falling from considerable heights and taking dangerous assignments during an era when safety standards were far more limited than they are today.
One story is particularly revealing.
Vicky said his father once accepted a stunt involving a horse even though he did not know how to ride. Sham fell and fractured his hand.
According to Vicky's account, he did not have enough money to properly treat the injury because he also needed money for food.
It is an uncomfortable reminder of what “struggle” meant for stunt professionals of that period.
It wasn't simply waiting for a big break.
The work itself could carry serious physical consequences.
May 1990 brought the next major turning point
Ten years after joining the stunt union, Sham's career changed again.
In his August anniversary message, he identified May 1990 as the point when he received an opportunity to work as an action director.
He thanked the producers and directors who subsequently trusted him, hired him and allowed him to keep learning.
Earlier accounts identify the Malayalam film Indrajaalam as his breakthrough into action direction.
From there, the scale of his work changed dramatically.
His credits over the decades have included films such as Black Friday, Krrish, Kaminey, Gangs of Wasseypur, PK, Dangal, Bajrangi Bhaijaan, Tiger Zinda Hai, Padmaavat, Sanju, Simmba, Uri: The Surgical Strike, Brahmāstra, Dunki and Animal.
The man who once needed friends to assemble ₹1,000 had become one of the industry's best-known action professionals.
For Sham, action direction eventually became about trust
The physical danger of his early stunt career also helps explain how Sham describes his responsibilities today.
In a 2024 interview with ETimes, he emphasised that actors place enormous trust in an action director and that maintaining safety is therefore fundamental to the job.
His principle was straightforward: the person performing the stunt matters regardless of status.
Whether the performer is an unknown stunt professional, a major star or even his own son, the action director's responsibility remains the same.
That philosophy was tested unusually personally when Sham designed an action sequence involving Vicky in Rajkumar Hirani's Dunki.
The scene required Vicky's character to be engulfed in flames.
Sham acknowledged that he was exceptionally tense while executing it, but maintained that his professional responsibility towards Vicky had to remain the same as it would for anyone else.
It is a remarkable full-circle detail.
The stuntman who once performed fire sequences because dangerous work was how he survived eventually became the action director responsible for keeping his own son safe during one.
Vicky and Sunny grew up knowing where the family's progress came from
Sham and his wife Veena did not hide those early hardships from their sons.
Vicky has repeatedly spoken about growing up with an awareness of how gradually the family's circumstances improved.
He recalled being raised in a 10-by-10 room in a Mumbai chawl and watching his parents acquire household furniture piece by piece as their finances improved. The family later progressed from the chawl to a one-bedroom home and then to a larger apartment.
Even when the family became more comfortable, Sham and Veena maintained a distinction between necessities and luxuries.
Vicky has said his parents would provide what their children needed, but luxuries had to be earned. Even when the family owned a second car, he wasn't automatically allowed to use it simply because it was available.
That upbringing becomes particularly relevant now that Vicky is himself one of Hindi cinema's leading actors.
Sham refused to promise Vicky an easy entry into films
Having an established action director as a father gave Vicky something valuable: proximity to the reality of filmmaking.
But Sham made clear that it wasn't a guarantee of an acting career.
Vicky has recalled his father telling him that he wasn't powerful enough to simply create opportunities for him and that Vicky should expect to knock on doors. In a 2026 interview, Vicky again remembered Sham telling him that he was not a “big guy” capable of launching his son's career.
Sham has separately said that when Vicky and Sunny wanted to become actors, he did not approach filmmakers asking them to cast his sons.
His reasoning was pragmatic: his professional goodwill might get them basic courtesy, but nobody would invest crores in a film simply because they were his children.
For a man whose own opportunity began only because other people helped him, that might initially sound contradictory.
It isn't.
Sham's story distinguishes between helping someone get an opportunity and being able to guarantee their success.
His friends helped him afford a union membership.
What happened after that still required years of dangerous work, learning and persistence.
One detail in the anniversary coverage needs correcting
There is also a factual issue worth addressing because it has already appeared in multiple reports.
Some coverage describes Sham as completing 40 years in the industry.
That cannot be reconciled with the date Sham himself gave.
August 8, 1980 to August 8, 2026 is 46 years.
Indeed, the same reports that use “40 years” in their headlines or introductions quote Sham saying:
“Forty-six years ago, on this day, August 8, 1980…”
Other contemporary reports correctly describe the milestone as 46 years.
The Celebrity Hour should therefore use 46 years throughout the article.
This is precisely the kind of small numerical error that can spread quickly when multiple publications reproduce the same news agency copy.
At 70, Sham Kaushal isn't planning retirement
The anniversary isn't being marked from retirement.
In a June 2026 interview with India Today, the 70-year-old action director said he had no plans to stop working and described himself as someone who continues to enjoy going to film sets.
That changes the meaning of the anniversary slightly.
This isn't a farewell reflection from someone looking back at a completed career.
It is a checkpoint.
Forty-six years after joining the stunt union, Sham remains connected to the profession that he originally entered almost accidentally.
And the thing he chose to commemorate wasn't simply how far he had travelled.
It was who helped him begin.
The Celebrity Hour Take
There is an obvious way to tell Sham Kaushal's story: poor young man arrives in Mumbai, struggles, works hard and eventually becomes a celebrated Bollywood action director whose son becomes a movie star.
It is inspirational.
It is also incomplete.
Sham's own anniversary message makes the journey less individualistic than that version suggests.
Someone lent him ₹100.
Someone else lent him ₹200.
A hotel owner gave him a meal when he couldn't afford one.
A friend helped with rent.
Stunt professionals taught him.
Producers eventually trusted him.
Those individual acts accumulated into a career.
That is what makes his ₹1,000 union-fee story worth remembering. The amount itself isn't the point. The fact that several people helped assemble it is.
There is also a broader film-industry story here.
Audiences generally encounter action through stars: the hero jumping from a building, walking through flames or fighting on top of a moving vehicle.
Sham's career began on the other side of that image, among the stunt professionals taking risks without becoming the face on the poster.
His progression from stuntman to action director mirrors the development of an entire technical craft whose best work is often designed to make danger look effortless while keeping performers safe.
Forty-six years later, the most appropriate description of Sham Kaushal's career may therefore be the one he effectively provided himself.
Not self-made.
People-made.
Sources & Verification
This report was independently researched using Sham Kaushal's August 8, 2026 anniversary statement as preserved in contemporary coverage, earlier interviews with Sham about action and safety, and separate interviews in which Vicky Kaushal discussed his father's early financial and physical struggles. The chronology was independently checked: Sham's stated entry date of August 8, 1980 means the 2026 anniversary marks 46 years, despite some current reports incorrectly describing it as 40.




Comments